Friday, July 30, 2010
I Think I Saw A Horror Film Like This Once
The late rains and cool weather created a bumper crop of grasshopper food--and a bumper crop of grasshoppers, many of which are covering our windows and screens, often in the process of making more little grasshoppers. I would take pictures, but the Grasshopper Family Values Council would object.
This Just Gets Better
Champerty was prohibited at common law:
Champerty, campi-partitio, is a species of maintenance, and punished in the same manner being a bargain with a plaintiff or defendant campum partire, to divide the land or other matter sued for between them, if they prevail at law ; whereupon the champertor is to carry on the party's suit at his own expencea. Thus champart, in the French law, signifies a similar division of profits, being a part of the crop annually due to the landlord by bargain or custom. In our sense of the word, it signifies the purchasing of a suit, or right of suing: a practice so much abhorred by our law, that it is one main reason why a chose in action, thing of which one hath the right but not the possession, is not assignable at common law ; because no man should purchase any pretence to sue in another's right. These pests of civil society, that are perpetually endeavouring to disturb the repose of their neighbours, and officiously interfering in other men's quarrels, even at the hazard of their own fortunes, were severely animadverted on by the Roman law... [Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of England (1795), 4:135 ]Federal courts seem to follow the laws of the state in which they are located with respect to champerty questions:
To prove champerty, it must be shown that the "foundational intent to sue on the claim must at least have been the primary purpose for, if not the sole motivation behind, entering into the transaction." Id., 94 N.Y.2d at 736, 709 N.Y.S.2d 865, 731 N.E.2d 581. [In re Lynn, 285 BR 858, 863, 864 - Bankruptcy Court, SD New York 2002]Nevada Supreme Court decisions as late as 1997 are still treating questions of champerty as serious matters, such as in Schwartz v. Eliades, 939 P. 2d 1034 (Nev. 1997), and this one:
At common law, an assignment of the right to a personal injury action was prohibited. See Karp v. Speizer, 132 Ariz. 599, 600-01, 647 P.2d 1197, 1198-99 (App.1982). Many jurisdictions continue to adhere to the common law view. See 6 Am.Jur.2D Assignments § 37 (1963). However, in most states an attorney is allowed by statute to receive an assignment of a portion of the proceeds of a tort action through a contingency fee agreement with a client. SCR 155; Cal.Bus. & Prof.Code § 6146 (West 1990); N.Y.Jud. Law § 474 (McKinney 1983). ...Righthaven clearly purchased the copyrights for the purpose of suing. They aren't representing the R-J. This is an assignment of a tort action, not of the proceeds. I see why one of the Motions wanted to know the details of the relationship.
We conclude that the district court was correct in ruling that a meaningful legal distinction exists between assigning the rights to a tort action and assigning the proceeds from such an action. See In re Musser, 24 B.R. at 920-21. When the proceeds of a settlement are assigned, the injured party retains control of their lawsuit and the assignee cannot pursue the action independently. See Charlotte Hosp. Auth., 455 S.E.2d at 657. Also, the ability to assign portions of the proceeds of the suit allows an injured plaintiff to obtain an attorney through a contingency fee arrangement and allows the plaintiff to pursue the action without being burdened by medical bills associated with the accident.
In this case, Shawn and Marcia retained control of their lawsuit against the school district without any interference from Expressway. Thus, we conclude that the public policy against assigning tort actions was not present in this case. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's ruling that Expressway's assignment was not void as against public policy. [Achrem v. Expressway Plaza Ltd., 917 P. 2d 447, 448, 449 (Nev. 1996)]
Thursday, July 29, 2010
John Fogerty of Credence Clearwater Revival & Copyright Law
Yup. An article from The Marquette Lawyer discusses Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc. (1994), in which the Supreme Court upheld the authority of the courts to require Fantasy Records to pay Fogerty's attorneys' fees for a copyright suit in which Fantasy sued Fogerty, and lost. Thanks to Blog Law Blog for the pointer--they pointedly encourage Righthaven defendants to look at it.
Tuesday, July 27, 2010
At Least, Therre's Someone Else To Blame
The July 27, 2010 Las Vegas Sun reports that RightHaven's newest suit has been filed against "Former mob enforcer turned government witness Anthony Fiato," also known as "Tony the Animal." Isn't it lovely that Steve Gibson thinks so highly of Mr. Fiato's moral reformation that he feels safe filing a suit against him? At least, if Mr. Gibson has an unfortunate incident, we know who is at the top of the suspect list.
Amazing
I talked to a very well-known attorney who does copyright law--and he agreed, we have a strong case that what The Armed Citizen was doing was Fair Use, because of the noncommercial, scholarly purpose of it. But we should settle, because that would be cheaper than hiring anyone to defend us. The system is set up to make sure that the plaintiffs in copyright cases win.
Short of finding some organization that cares enough about gun rights or freedom of expression to fund such a defense (and I doubt that such an organization exists anywhere in this country), it looks like these creeps are going to get a settlement.
Short of finding some organization that cares enough about gun rights or freedom of expression to fund such a defense (and I doubt that such an organization exists anywhere in this country), it looks like these creeps are going to get a settlement.
Monday, July 26, 2010
Scandalous System
I've talked to several different attorneys today: the attorney for my homeowner's insurance (no, they won't cover this); several attorneys active in the gun rights movement--and all agree that this is a case that we could probably win, especially because it is so blatantly obvious what is going on with RightHaven LLC. But there are problems:
1. You have to have an attorney to fight something like this. Even if we were fight this pro se (meaning, in legal mumbo-jumbo, representing ourselves), which is a risky and foolish thing, we would still have to appear in person in Las Vegas to fight it. The cost of flying to Vegas to fight it would be a big chunk of the cost of hiring a Vegas IP attorney.
2. There is a small possibility that if we won a complete victory in court, we might be able to get the court to award us our attorney fees for malicious prosecution--but by no means certain.
3. This is going to be an expensive case, unless a court rules in our favor concerning jurisdiction--even if we win. If we could find a copyright lawyer in Las Vegas admitted to the federal bar who was on our side willing to work either pro bono or at some discounted rate, then it makes sense to fight. As it is, we may have to pick one out of the book--not exactly the strategy I would prefer.
4. RightHaven relies upon this. They don't have to be legally right. The system is set up to force us to decide whether to give them money, or give some lawyers money to fight them. There are no other choices. This is something that desperately needs fixing, with either "loser pays" or at least some obligation to at least contact the defendant before you file.
We have received a couple hundred dollars in contributions since this started. I suspect that unless we can find some organization that cares about gun rights enough to put a lawyer on this, we have no choice but to give RightHaven their pound of flesh.
1. You have to have an attorney to fight something like this. Even if we were fight this pro se (meaning, in legal mumbo-jumbo, representing ourselves), which is a risky and foolish thing, we would still have to appear in person in Las Vegas to fight it. The cost of flying to Vegas to fight it would be a big chunk of the cost of hiring a Vegas IP attorney.
2. There is a small possibility that if we won a complete victory in court, we might be able to get the court to award us our attorney fees for malicious prosecution--but by no means certain.
3. This is going to be an expensive case, unless a court rules in our favor concerning jurisdiction--even if we win. If we could find a copyright lawyer in Las Vegas admitted to the federal bar who was on our side willing to work either pro bono or at some discounted rate, then it makes sense to fight. As it is, we may have to pick one out of the book--not exactly the strategy I would prefer.
4. RightHaven relies upon this. They don't have to be legally right. The system is set up to force us to decide whether to give them money, or give some lawyers money to fight them. There are no other choices. This is something that desperately needs fixing, with either "loser pays" or at least some obligation to at least contact the defendant before you file.
We have received a couple hundred dollars in contributions since this started. I suspect that unless we can find some organization that cares about gun rights enough to put a lawyer on this, we have no choice but to give RightHaven their pound of flesh.
Sunday, July 25, 2010
Fair Use
Don't redistribute the content here. I'm playing this pretty close to the chest nonetheless, but please don't put any of this information in this posting anywhere else.
Wikipedia has a pretty interesting discussion of the ever changing boundaries of Fair Use with respect to copyright under American law. The case that seems closest to the situation The Armed Citizen is confronting is Los Angeles Times v. Free Republic LLC (C.D.Cal. 2000) -- and even here, there are substantial differences that would seem to benefit us, especially that the Los Angeles Times was actually selling the articles that Free Republic was posting in full. That is not the case with the articles in dispute from the Review-Journal. That Free Republic was essentially a commercial operation, not a scholarly function. I think there is at least a plausible claim that where there is uncertainty, it is most logical to err on the side of leniency.
If I am to believe the claims in the Wikipedia article, Justice Story's decision sitting as a circuit judge in Folsom v. Marsh (1841) determined that a major factor in determining whether someone was injured by copying is:
Wikipedia has a pretty interesting discussion of the ever changing boundaries of Fair Use with respect to copyright under American law. The case that seems closest to the situation The Armed Citizen is confronting is Los Angeles Times v. Free Republic LLC (C.D.Cal. 2000) -- and even here, there are substantial differences that would seem to benefit us, especially that the Los Angeles Times was actually selling the articles that Free Republic was posting in full. That is not the case with the articles in dispute from the Review-Journal. That Free Republic was essentially a commercial operation, not a scholarly function. I think there is at least a plausible claim that where there is uncertainty, it is most logical to err on the side of leniency.
If I am to believe the claims in the Wikipedia article, Justice Story's decision sitting as a circuit judge in Folsom v. Marsh (1841) determined that a major factor in determining whether someone was injured by copying is:
The entirety of the copyright is the property of the author; and it is no defence, that another person has appropriated a part, and not the whole, of any property. Neither does it necessarily depend upon the quantity taken, whether it is an infringement of the copyright or not. It is often affected by other considerations, the value of the materials taken, and the importance of it to the sale of the original work.Indeed, that seems to be what sank Free Republic--their actions clearly impaired the marketability of the articles that the Los Angeles Times was selling. There might be a good case that loss of advertising revenue connected to the Times website was substantial--but that's not likely even close to 1% of the $75,000 RightHaven is demanding.
Starve The Beast!
No Lawyers--Only Guns and Money has a list of all the newspapers owned by the Stephens Group, who own the Las Vegas Review-Journal, and who are apparently going to be the next set of newspapers going after bloggers who screw up and copy too much (or some cases, only link to an article).
Make sure your friends and favorite bloggers know that these are people that need no traffic.
Make sure your friends and favorite bloggers know that these are people that need no traffic.
Warnings!
I am surprised at how many websites out there reproduced material from The Armed Citizen. (Not that I'm going to sue them for copyright infringement.) However: it is very important for every such blog or website to scrub those articles, both to protect themselves from RightHaven, and to protect The Armed Citizen.
Saturday, July 24, 2010
Checking With Attorney About Doing A Scrub on Armed Citizen
I'm checking to see if it would be safe to bring back The Armed Citizen by having part of my army go through, and edit every news account down to three paragraphs, then republish. This is a completely simpler task than going through my personal blog, that's for sure.
Rational Ignorance of Government
Ilya Somin over at Volokh Conspiracy often blogs about how the average American is rationally ignorant of government. They don't know much about it, they don't particularly care what it does--and this is rational. It's not worth spending a lot of time voting, because your vote doesn't change much.
I cringe when I read stuff like that. Yet now that I am teaching State & Local Government again, it is clear that this accurately describes the 1/3 of the American adult population that never votes. Some of these are 20somethings, but even many of the adults in their 40s aren't clear on the difference between a state legislature and Congress. Why? They never much cared what government does, and so didn't pay attention.
I cringe when I read stuff like that. Yet now that I am teaching State & Local Government again, it is clear that this accurately describes the 1/3 of the American adult population that never votes. Some of these are 20somethings, but even many of the adults in their 40s aren't clear on the difference between a state legislature and Congress. Why? They never much cared what government does, and so didn't pay attention.
Friday, July 23, 2010
The Wonders of Law
I am assisting my attorney on this matter. The things that I learn along the way make me wonder how smart the RightHaven attorneys are. They have filed all these 79 suits so far demanding $75,000 each--and there's a reason for this.
The section of U.S. law that regulates civil suits in federal court between citizens of different states (28 USC 1332) requires that the "amount in controversy" must be at least $75,000. In short, claim $75,000 at least, or the federal courts aren't interested in hearing a dispute between citizens of different states. However, 28 USC 1332(b) provides that if the final judgment is less than $75,000, the district court "may deny costs to the plaintiff, and, in addition, may impose costs on the plaintiff."
In the suit against Dave Burnett and myself, there's only one claim for copyright infringement involving a registered copyrighted news story, and therefore only one that allows them request a fixed penalty (the statutory civil penalty), instead of the actual losses the Review-Journal suffered, and the actual profits we made. The range of allowed civil penalties is $750 to $30,000 per infringement (and that is a substitute for the actual damages, which are trivial for all of these stories). Unless RightHaven is going to demonstrate that actual damages from the other supposed six violations with no statutory penalty available add up to $45,000, they aren't going to make the $75,000 amount in controversy--not even close. (There is a $150,000 civil penalty available, but that requires intentional, knowing copyright violation, as evidenced by hiding your name on domain registration.)
I was a little unclear whether what is called Federal Question Jurisdiction takes precedence over Diversity Jurisdiction's "amount in controversy" question. Federal district courts can hear cases involving violations of federal law, and 28 USC 1332(b) does say that "when express provision therefor is otherwise made in a statute of the United States" the amount in controversy does not apply. So does this mean that copyright law violates do not require the $75,000 minimum? This discussion at http://www.copyright.gov/docs/regstat032906.html and http://www.copyright.gov/orphan/comments/OW0642-PPA.pdf would seem to indicate that the amount in controversy minimum applies to copyright violations as well--hence the request from professional photographers for Congress to create small claims copyright court. They can't go to federal court to pursue copyright infringements for unregistered copyrights, because the damages are usually hundreds or thousands of dollars at most--and even registered copyrights would require at least three separate infringements to get up to the $75,000 amount in controversy level.
The more I try to understand this, the more anarchy, and returning to a state of nature, sounds good.
The section of U.S. law that regulates civil suits in federal court between citizens of different states (28 USC 1332) requires that the "amount in controversy" must be at least $75,000. In short, claim $75,000 at least, or the federal courts aren't interested in hearing a dispute between citizens of different states. However, 28 USC 1332(b) provides that if the final judgment is less than $75,000, the district court "may deny costs to the plaintiff, and, in addition, may impose costs on the plaintiff."
In the suit against Dave Burnett and myself, there's only one claim for copyright infringement involving a registered copyrighted news story, and therefore only one that allows them request a fixed penalty (the statutory civil penalty), instead of the actual losses the Review-Journal suffered, and the actual profits we made. The range of allowed civil penalties is $750 to $30,000 per infringement (and that is a substitute for the actual damages, which are trivial for all of these stories). Unless RightHaven is going to demonstrate that actual damages from the other supposed six violations with no statutory penalty available add up to $45,000, they aren't going to make the $75,000 amount in controversy--not even close. (There is a $150,000 civil penalty available, but that requires intentional, knowing copyright violation, as evidenced by hiding your name on domain registration.)
I was a little unclear whether what is called Federal Question Jurisdiction takes precedence over Diversity Jurisdiction's "amount in controversy" question. Federal district courts can hear cases involving violations of federal law, and 28 USC 1332(b) does say that "when express provision therefor is otherwise made in a statute of the United States" the amount in controversy does not apply. So does this mean that copyright law violates do not require the $75,000 minimum? This discussion at http://www.copyright.gov/docs/regstat032906.html and http://www.copyright.gov/orphan/comments/OW0642-PPA.pdf would seem to indicate that the amount in controversy minimum applies to copyright violations as well--hence the request from professional photographers for Congress to create small claims copyright court. They can't go to federal court to pursue copyright infringements for unregistered copyrights, because the damages are usually hundreds or thousands of dollars at most--and even registered copyrights would require at least three separate infringements to get up to the $75,000 amount in controversy level.
The more I try to understand this, the more anarchy, and returning to a state of nature, sounds good.
Thursday, July 22, 2010
The End
I've decided that the costs of liablity insurance are too high to make this continue to make sense, especially in light of sleazy garbage such as the Las Vegas Review-Journal lawsuit. (And ironically, we are supposedly on the same side.) America is enthusiastically headed into a cesspool, I'm not doing anything that is likely to even slow the downslope speed of destruction. Tonight I will download everything from the blog, and delete everything but this explanation.
Thanks to all the readers who have provided encouragement over the years. America is in a death spiral.
UPDATE: I think the solution is to make this blog only visible to a few. There's a way to make this blog require a login. I think I am going to try it. It's disappointing, because it limits it to those who I trust not to be agents of evil. You will probably have to email me to get permission, and agree not to redistribute anything that contains any quoted material--even one word. But I hate to lose this vast body of useful information, and the friendships of those who read.
By the way: I am not planning to give in. I'm planning to fight. Thank you all for the contributions towards the cause. I can't imagine any jury that won't look at this behavior and ask the judge's permission to slap the plaintiffs for their behavior.
Does anyone know a way with Blogger to make every posting except a few go into Draft mode, so that I can see them, but they aren't visible?
UPDATE 2: Change of plans. I'm moving my almost 10,000 old postings somewhere that I can see, but no one else can see. This will be starting over.
Thanks to all the readers who have provided encouragement over the years. America is in a death spiral.
UPDATE: I think the solution is to make this blog only visible to a few. There's a way to make this blog require a login. I think I am going to try it. It's disappointing, because it limits it to those who I trust not to be agents of evil. You will probably have to email me to get permission, and agree not to redistribute anything that contains any quoted material--even one word. But I hate to lose this vast body of useful information, and the friendships of those who read.
By the way: I am not planning to give in. I'm planning to fight. Thank you all for the contributions towards the cause. I can't imagine any jury that won't look at this behavior and ask the judge's permission to slap the plaintiffs for their behavior.
Does anyone know a way with Blogger to make every posting except a few go into Draft mode, so that I can see them, but they aren't visible?
UPDATE 2: Change of plans. I'm moving my almost 10,000 old postings somewhere that I can see, but no one else can see. This will be starting over.
Wednesday, July 21, 2010
ScopeRoller Going Forward
I have two orders waiting to mail tomorrow, one order completed and paid for--but the customer neglected to give me a shipping address, and an order to make for shipment to Australia after I make it tomorrow evening. Let's see, if I could average 1 1/2 orders a day, I could quit the day job!
Sure Glad We're in Post-Racial America
From the July 21, 2010 Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel:
Madison — State elections officials Wednesday narrowly rejected a Milwaukee Assembly candidate's attempt to run with the slogan "NOT the 'whiteman's bitch' " under her name on the ballot.One board member, Thomas Barland, insisted that there wasn't a problem, saying that he didn't "interpret it as racial." Not racial? Wow. There are days that I despair of this country ever getting past race--but increasingly, it's not Klansmen. It's black people like Ieshuh Griffin, intent on keeping racial hatred stirred up.
Ieshuh Griffin, an independent candidate with a history of feuds with local officials, said in response she would sue the state Government Accountability Board for infringing on her freedom of speech.
There Are Days It Just Isn't Worth It
I've spent quite a bit of the last twenty years trying to make a difference in the political system. Garbage like this below makes me wonder if it is too late to solve this country's problems, and maybe I should stop trying to make it better. It's just not worth it.
Outrageous Lawsuit
Today, The Armed Citizen received informal notice in the form of a media inquiry about a lawsuit against this website and its owners, David Burnett and Clayton Cramer. The lawsuit, reportedly filed in US District Court on July 20th, alleges that The Armed Citizen and its owners "willfully copied" original source content from the Las Vegas Review-Journal.
According to news reports, Righthaven LLC has reportedly filed lawsuits against 75 other political websites and/or blogs without prior contact or attempt at resolution. The sites include FreeRepublic.com, the Safe and Secure Internet Gambling Initiative and the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws.
The "offending" entries consist of six stories, some of which were short enough to qualify under the Fair Use Rule, out of nearly 4,700 entries. The six stories are still publicly available on the Las Vegas Review-Journal's website, to which we linked.
The Armed Citizen has been excerpting articles from newspaper, TV station, and radio station websites for a number of years. If any copyright holders decided that The Armed Citizen had exceeded fair use, they only needed to send us an email. Instead, in a bid to target and intimidate small websites, they have chosen to pursue legal action.
At this time, the future of The Armed Citizen is uncertain, and possibly in jeopardy, thanks to Righthaven LLC and the Las Vegas Review-Journal.
Their contact information is listed below.
Las Vegas Review-Journal
1111 W. Bonanza Road
P.O. Box 70
Las Vegas, NV 89125
Main phone number:
702-383-0211
Newspaper office number:
702-383-0264
Copy of Lawsuit (As forwarded by a reporter...The Armed Citizen has received no official notice of pending litigation.)
To e-mail David and Clayton, write to Tips@thearmedcitizen.com
Further information:
Las Vegas newspaper sues websites over use of content
Conservative website among 3 sued over R-J copyrights
LV Review-Journal may be violating law with selective copyright suits
REVIEW-JOURNAL SUES ITS OWN SOURCE
UPDATE: It turns out that the minimum amount of a controversy filed in federal court involving citizens of multiple states is $75,000 (which is something that I already knew). The lawyers are relying on us to "settle" because they know darn well that their actual damages aren't even close to $75,000. They might have trouble proving $75 worth of actual damages. This is perilously close to extortion. Interesting discussion of this over here.
UPDATE 2: These lawyers have filed dozens of such suits, always demanding $75,000 (the federal controversy minimum)--and it looks like some people are starting to fight back. I wonder how many people like me showing up and demanding proof of $75,000 in damages before some federal judge tells these crooks to go chase ambulances, like other shysters.
UPDATE 3: I have taken down the entire Armed Citizen blog. It's just too dangerous. And this blog may go away tomorrow as well. It's just too dangerous. There are criminal enterprises out there prepared to use the law in ways that it was not intended.
According to news reports, Righthaven LLC has reportedly filed lawsuits against 75 other political websites and/or blogs without prior contact or attempt at resolution. The sites include FreeRepublic.com, the Safe and Secure Internet Gambling Initiative and the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws.
The "offending" entries consist of six stories, some of which were short enough to qualify under the Fair Use Rule, out of nearly 4,700 entries. The six stories are still publicly available on the Las Vegas Review-Journal's website, to which we linked.
The Armed Citizen has been excerpting articles from newspaper, TV station, and radio station websites for a number of years. If any copyright holders decided that The Armed Citizen had exceeded fair use, they only needed to send us an email. Instead, in a bid to target and intimidate small websites, they have chosen to pursue legal action.
At this time, the future of The Armed Citizen is uncertain, and possibly in jeopardy, thanks to Righthaven LLC and the Las Vegas Review-Journal.
Their contact information is listed below.
Las Vegas Review-Journal
1111 W. Bonanza Road
P.O. Box 70
Las Vegas, NV 89125
Main phone number:
702-383-0211
Newspaper office number:
702-383-0264
Copy of Lawsuit (As forwarded by a reporter...The Armed Citizen has received no official notice of pending litigation.)
To e-mail David and Clayton, write to Tips@thearmedcitizen.com
Further information:
Las Vegas newspaper sues websites over use of content
Conservative website among 3 sued over R-J copyrights
LV Review-Journal may be violating law with selective copyright suits
REVIEW-JOURNAL SUES ITS OWN SOURCE
UPDATE: It turns out that the minimum amount of a controversy filed in federal court involving citizens of multiple states is $75,000 (which is something that I already knew). The lawyers are relying on us to "settle" because they know darn well that their actual damages aren't even close to $75,000. They might have trouble proving $75 worth of actual damages. This is perilously close to extortion. Interesting discussion of this over here.
UPDATE 2: These lawyers have filed dozens of such suits, always demanding $75,000 (the federal controversy minimum)--and it looks like some people are starting to fight back. I wonder how many people like me showing up and demanding proof of $75,000 in damages before some federal judge tells these crooks to go chase ambulances, like other shysters.
UPDATE 3: I have taken down the entire Armed Citizen blog. It's just too dangerous. And this blog may go away tomorrow as well. It's just too dangerous. There are criminal enterprises out there prepared to use the law in ways that it was not intended.
Machining Aluminum, Getting Experience
I discovered that the beautiful parts that I made a couple of days ago are just a bit short for the tripod in question. (Fortunately, I discovered this before shipping.) I discovered that what had been the franchisee for Metal Supermarkets in Boise has moved to Garden City, and become Gem State Metals, and I went there to get some 2" OD, .125" wall aluminum tubing. Instead of boring from 1.47" to 1.73", I just bought tubing that was already 1.74", and made one quick pass with the emery cloth on the inside to make it pretty.
But I also suddenly found that the easy time I had three nights ago squaring the 1/4" wall aluminum tubing didn't work with .125" wall tubing. Why? Same alloy: 6061 T6. It turns out that:
1. Getting very precisely centered in the lathe is far more important with aluminum than acetal--probably because the aluminum isn't self-lubricating.
2. Boring the inside of the tube requires a relatively low speed, but a heavier cut, to avoid "chattering," which often leads to the part being pulled from the chuck. But squaring the tubing requires a medium to medium-high speed, and at least until you get an even end, very light cuts, typically .005"-.010". I wasted a solid hour figuring this out.
Experience, unfortunately, is among the most expensive things to get. I just hope that this experience turns into something economically useful, unlike most everything else with which I have developed an expertise.
But I also suddenly found that the easy time I had three nights ago squaring the 1/4" wall aluminum tubing didn't work with .125" wall tubing. Why? Same alloy: 6061 T6. It turns out that:
1. Getting very precisely centered in the lathe is far more important with aluminum than acetal--probably because the aluminum isn't self-lubricating.
2. Boring the inside of the tube requires a relatively low speed, but a heavier cut, to avoid "chattering," which often leads to the part being pulled from the chuck. But squaring the tubing requires a medium to medium-high speed, and at least until you get an even end, very light cuts, typically .005"-.010". I wasted a solid hour figuring this out.
Experience, unfortunately, is among the most expensive things to get. I just hope that this experience turns into something economically useful, unlike most everything else with which I have developed an expertise.
Monday, July 19, 2010
Voyager Mission: Fond Memories
There's been a bit of discussion of the Voyager mission of late, since these space probes are still operational, almost thirty years after launch. My first full-time job, when I ran out of money and had to drop out of college, was writing Voyager telemetry software at Jet Propulsion Labs in Pasadena. I even received this cool certificate in the mail, some years later: a "Group Achievement Award," which simply means that I was part of a big group that did our jobs really well.
I wish I could say that I did my job really well, but I was a not terribly mature 18 year old, and in retrospect, some of the telemetry filtering software I wrote in Univac 1530 assembly language wasn't very good. Of course, if you knew much about Univac 1530 assembly language, you would wonder if anyone could write it well.
It was a fascinating experience. I was an amateur astronomer, so working on a space mission was so cool. I was just a kid (I turned 19 while I was working there), and in retrospect, as neat as the job was, it was about as miserable a time as I think I have ever experienced. Friday nights, I would buy a pizza at Straw Hat in La Crescenta, drive up to an overlook on the Angeles Crest Higway, and have myself a good cry.
I wish I could say that I did my job really well, but I was a not terribly mature 18 year old, and in retrospect, some of the telemetry filtering software I wrote in Univac 1530 assembly language wasn't very good. Of course, if you knew much about Univac 1530 assembly language, you would wonder if anyone could write it well.
It was a fascinating experience. I was an amateur astronomer, so working on a space mission was so cool. I was just a kid (I turned 19 while I was working there), and in retrospect, as neat as the job was, it was about as miserable a time as I think I have ever experienced. Friday nights, I would buy a pizza at Straw Hat in La Crescenta, drive up to an overlook on the Angeles Crest Higway, and have myself a good cry.
Sunday, July 18, 2010
Manufacturing in Aluminum
I am beginning to switch over from manufacturing my casters assemblies entirely in acetal to primarily aluminum, for a variety of reasons that I have discussed previously. I was a little unsure if I was going to get a pretty finish on the aluminum or not--but here's the first article for one of the round sleeve models.
It is gorgeous--and all I had to do was to hold some 150 emery cloth to it while it was turning it on the lathe!
The first happy customer for the aluminum version for the new Losmandy Lightweight tripod sent me these pictures.
This picture emphasizes how well the Deluxe wheels work in high grass.
It is gorgeous--and all I had to do was to hold some 150 emery cloth to it while it was turning it on the lathe!
The first happy customer for the aluminum version for the new Losmandy Lightweight tripod sent me these pictures.
This picture emphasizes how well the Deluxe wheels work in high grass.
Wednesday, July 14, 2010
New Threats To Freedom
A new book edited by Adam Bellow just arrived on my doorstep. I have not had a chance to read the book yet--just cracked open the introduction by Adam Bellow, and it left a pretty decent taste in my mouth. While many of the essays are by people who are libertarian, not conservative (Bruce Bawer and Glenn Reynolds, for example), Bellow's opening essay emphasizes some of the important themes of Solzhenitsyn's 1978 address at Harvard: that individualism and materialism carried to extremes has its own set of problems. There is considerable common ground between classical liberalism/conservativism and libertarianism, as long as you stay away from the extreme ends of social conservatives and libertarians. (If you want to know where that middle ground is: if libertarians don't insist that the government must recognize gay marriage, social conservatives don't have to insist on making homosexuality a crime.)
Anyway, the publishers of New Threats To Freedom has an essay contest over here. You might want to consider entering your efforts.
Anyway, the publishers of New Threats To Freedom has an essay contest over here. You might want to consider entering your efforts.
The Importance of Having a Mechanic You Can Trust
The Corvette has been intermittently turning on three different complaints: "SERVICE ABS" "SERVICE ACTIVE HNDLG" and "SERVICE TRACTION" for a year or so--but the problem always went away when I restarted the car. This set of complaints came on solidly a few days ago, so I took it into All Things Automotive in Meridian. One of the error codes involves the sensor on the steering column, which feeds data into the ABS, active handling, and traction control systems. As I suspected it might be, my mechanic found that the wires from that sensor had been damaged by a rock (probably because of the crummy road between our driveway and the old highway). He is seeing about armoring the replacement wires.
I'm still waiting on the other error code, which is a complaint about low voltage from the ABS pump, but I am hoping this also turns out to be something as simple as a broken wire caused by bad roads.
UPDATE: No such luck. I'm afraid that my good and faithful companion is about to leave. The ABS pump electronics part is $1700 alone--and there's another part needed to get that operational. There comes a point where you have to own your possessions, not the other way around. I'm going to miss it, but unless the mechanic finds evidence that the rock collision that knocked out the steering sensor caused this other failure, I'm not getting it fixed. Without ABS, it is still safe to drive. I'm sure the Chevy dealer will be able to repair at a reasonable price and resell it.
I'm going to miss this car, but it was a hangover from the days when I worked in the private sector, and could afford silly luxuries like this.
UPDATE 2: I just put it up on Boise Craig's List for $15,500. If no one bites in a week, I'll probably let the dealer take it. They will detail it, fix the ABS system a lot cheaper than I can, and probably offer it for more like $17,000.
UPDATE 3: Praise God! I paid $147.10 this morning--and all the complaints are gone! The ABS system and Traction Control System idiot lights? Gone. As near as I can tell, whatever is throwing codes C1217 and C1243 was intermittent, and once my mechanic repaired the problem with the wires to the steering column sensor, the other problems stopped complaining. How will I know if there is still a real problem there? I've had this car 55,000 miles so far, and I have yet to feel the ABS system pulsing back at me through the brakes--because I don't tend to get myself into situations that require extreme braking, and let's face it, the Corvette's brakes and tires create an entirely new definition of "extreme braking." In any case, it's happy, I'm happy, and I'm glad that I didn't have to put out any real money to get this fixed.
UPDATE 4: No, it's intermittent because the relay in the EBTCM is intermittently failing--and I should expect continued decline until it gives out altogether. Oh well. When I worked at HP, I would get together at lunch with some fellow Christians. Tom reminded me, shortly after I bought the Corvette, "It's all going to burn." Yet another reason why we own possessions--but don't let them own us--and above all, we don't let things don't precedence over stuff that matters.
I'm still waiting on the other error code, which is a complaint about low voltage from the ABS pump, but I am hoping this also turns out to be something as simple as a broken wire caused by bad roads.
UPDATE: No such luck. I'm afraid that my good and faithful companion is about to leave. The ABS pump electronics part is $1700 alone--and there's another part needed to get that operational. There comes a point where you have to own your possessions, not the other way around. I'm going to miss it, but unless the mechanic finds evidence that the rock collision that knocked out the steering sensor caused this other failure, I'm not getting it fixed. Without ABS, it is still safe to drive. I'm sure the Chevy dealer will be able to repair at a reasonable price and resell it.
I'm going to miss this car, but it was a hangover from the days when I worked in the private sector, and could afford silly luxuries like this.
UPDATE 2: I just put it up on Boise Craig's List for $15,500. If no one bites in a week, I'll probably let the dealer take it. They will detail it, fix the ABS system a lot cheaper than I can, and probably offer it for more like $17,000.
UPDATE 3: Praise God! I paid $147.10 this morning--and all the complaints are gone! The ABS system and Traction Control System idiot lights? Gone. As near as I can tell, whatever is throwing codes C1217 and C1243 was intermittent, and once my mechanic repaired the problem with the wires to the steering column sensor, the other problems stopped complaining. How will I know if there is still a real problem there? I've had this car 55,000 miles so far, and I have yet to feel the ABS system pulsing back at me through the brakes--because I don't tend to get myself into situations that require extreme braking, and let's face it, the Corvette's brakes and tires create an entirely new definition of "extreme braking." In any case, it's happy, I'm happy, and I'm glad that I didn't have to put out any real money to get this fixed.
UPDATE 4: No, it's intermittent because the relay in the EBTCM is intermittently failing--and I should expect continued decline until it gives out altogether. Oh well. When I worked at HP, I would get together at lunch with some fellow Christians. Tom reminded me, shortly after I bought the Corvette, "It's all going to burn." Yet another reason why we own possessions--but don't let them own us--and above all, we don't let things don't precedence over stuff that matters.
The Only Good News From My Sinus Infection
I went into the doctor yesterday for my twice yearly sinus infection. When the nurse checked my blood pressure yesterday, it was 130/70. That's pretty good for someone my age, and carrying more weight than I should. The treadmill is helping.
Monday, July 12, 2010
Another Reminder Homosexuality & Freedom of Speech Are Incompatible
An adjunct is teaching a class about Catholicism at the University of Illinois, Urbana. As part of that class, he discusses what the Catholic Church believes about natural law and homosexuality. So he's fired. From the July 9, 2010 Urbana News-Gazette:
You've signed up for a class about Catholicism. Inevitably, this will mean learning what Catholicism teaches--and Catholicism teaches that homosexuality is wrong. It sounds like the adjunct was doing his job: teaching students what Catholicism teaches.
I taught first semester Western Civ this last semester. Inevitably, I presented a warts and all history of the Catholic Church, of Islam, and of Protestantism. They all did good things at times; they all did evil as well, sometimes even at the same time. I am sure that somewhere, there's a Catholic, a Muslim, or a Protestant, who probably found it unpleasant to hear about the bad stuff. But you can't understand where we are today as a civilization without understanding what happened--and a forthright statement of Catholic doctrine about homosexuality is no more "hate speech" than a forthright discussion of the ideology of Communism, or National Socialism, or Social Darwinism.
Homosexuality is fast becoming the new fascism.
One of the students complained about this email--supposedly for a "friend" who was also a student in the class, calling Howell's statements about homosexuality (which are definitely Catholic doctrine, whether you agree with it or not) "hate speech."
Kenneth Howell was told after the spring semester ended that he would no longer be teaching in the UI's Department of Religion. The decision came after a student complained about a discussion of homosexuality in the class in which Howell taught that the Catholic Church believes homosexual acts are morally wrong.
Howell has been an adjunct lecturer in the department for nine years, during which he taught two courses, Introduction to Catholicism and Modern Catholic Thought. He was also director of the Institute of Catholic Thought, part of St. John's Catholic Newman Center on campus and the Catholic Diocese of Peoria. Funding for his salary came from the Institute of Catholic Thought.
You've signed up for a class about Catholicism. Inevitably, this will mean learning what Catholicism teaches--and Catholicism teaches that homosexuality is wrong. It sounds like the adjunct was doing his job: teaching students what Catholicism teaches.
I taught first semester Western Civ this last semester. Inevitably, I presented a warts and all history of the Catholic Church, of Islam, and of Protestantism. They all did good things at times; they all did evil as well, sometimes even at the same time. I am sure that somewhere, there's a Catholic, a Muslim, or a Protestant, who probably found it unpleasant to hear about the bad stuff. But you can't understand where we are today as a civilization without understanding what happened--and a forthright statement of Catholic doctrine about homosexuality is no more "hate speech" than a forthright discussion of the ideology of Communism, or National Socialism, or Social Darwinism.
Homosexuality is fast becoming the new fascism.
Sunday, July 11, 2010
Hummingbirds
We went over to have dinner with some friends from church who live somewhere that makes our place look Big City, Bright Lights. They had hummingbird feeders--and gobs of hummingbirds. My wife was enchanted--and they are pretty amazing creatures. So we bought some hummingbird feeders--and in a day or two, we have Hummingbird Wars, as two or three of them will challenge each other for the right to feed.
Here's one picture that turned out rather well (reduced a bit for downloading).
Click to enlarge
This was with my Pentax K10D, 1/750th second, f/9.5, ISO 800 speed.You can see her wings, which are ordinarily invisible in flight because of how fast they are fluttering, actually stopped--and you can see her cute little feet.
Here's one picture that turned out rather well (reduced a bit for downloading).
Click to enlarge
This was with my Pentax K10D, 1/750th second, f/9.5, ISO 800 speed.You can see her wings, which are ordinarily invisible in flight because of how fast they are fluttering, actually stopped--and you can see her cute little feet.
Of Happy Meals & Obese Children
Friday morning I saw that the Center for Science in the Public Interest was threatening a lawsuit against McDonald's if they didn't stop including a toy in the Happy Meal--and really shockingly, McDonald's, instead of rolling over and begging not to be hurt, told them where to put their threat.
My reaction? I don't normally go out to eat where I work now, but not finding anything worthwhile in the leftover containers in the fridge at home Friday morning, I decided to walk down to the McDonald's half a mile from my office for lunch. If McDonald's is going to show a level of courage in responding to the left that American corporations seldom do, I might as well reward them.
Obesity is a real problem. Child obesity is a tragedy. But let's stop pretending that this is because McDonald's has a toy in the Happy Meal. It's not like kids for whom the Happy Meal is intended are getting there on their own. Mom and Dad are taking them there, and buying it. If there's a problem, it is a parental problem. Leftists insist on blaming corporations and free markets because the alternative is admitting that the same idiots that elected Obama lack the sense or the strength of will to say "No" to a five year old.
Once I reached McDonald's, I ordered the McDouble Mini Meal. It cost $3.17 with sales tax--and a McDouble is about what a cheeseburger used to be before the Big Mac Attack started. Is a Big Mac excessive? Absolutely! Unless, perhaps, you are a teenager who is burning 3000 calories a day, as many teenaged skateboarders seem to do. Even a McDouble is a bit much to eat every day: 390 calories for the sandwich, 19 grams of fat. But let's not confuse the symptom with the cause. Freedom is not the cause of the problem: a lack of self-discipline is the problem.
My reaction? I don't normally go out to eat where I work now, but not finding anything worthwhile in the leftover containers in the fridge at home Friday morning, I decided to walk down to the McDonald's half a mile from my office for lunch. If McDonald's is going to show a level of courage in responding to the left that American corporations seldom do, I might as well reward them.
Obesity is a real problem. Child obesity is a tragedy. But let's stop pretending that this is because McDonald's has a toy in the Happy Meal. It's not like kids for whom the Happy Meal is intended are getting there on their own. Mom and Dad are taking them there, and buying it. If there's a problem, it is a parental problem. Leftists insist on blaming corporations and free markets because the alternative is admitting that the same idiots that elected Obama lack the sense or the strength of will to say "No" to a five year old.
Once I reached McDonald's, I ordered the McDouble Mini Meal. It cost $3.17 with sales tax--and a McDouble is about what a cheeseburger used to be before the Big Mac Attack started. Is a Big Mac excessive? Absolutely! Unless, perhaps, you are a teenager who is burning 3000 calories a day, as many teenaged skateboarders seem to do. Even a McDouble is a bit much to eat every day: 390 calories for the sandwich, 19 grams of fat. But let's not confuse the symptom with the cause. Freedom is not the cause of the problem: a lack of self-discipline is the problem.
State Immigration Laws & Original Intent
I mentioned in my PajamasMedia article some weeks back that there was considerable evidence of original intent that supported Arizona's immigration law. I was thinking about it this morning before church, and I suddenly remembered a bunch more examples that support such an original intent argument--enough from which to construct a law review article. It's unfortunate that work that pays has to take precedence over work that really matters--but I have to prepare for next week's class. It's unfortunate that I can't devote myself to public policy problems--but I have to make a living.
LED Projectors
I need an inexpensive projector for my computer. There are a number of LED projectors that have come out that are small, light, and quite durable (because of LEDs, instead of conventional light sources), like this one. Of course, the tradeoff is that they are less bright--but in this case, I need something that projects on a wall in a small room for a church, so it doesn't have to be something that you would use for hundreds of people.
I went to Best Buy to actually look at these LED projectors--and unfortunately, they only had one actually connected, it was the $500 one, and no, it was too much work for anyone to pull another one out of a box and plug it in. The only reason to go to a store to buy something like this, instead of doing it online, is to be able to see it in action. But Best Buy in Boise apparently doesn't understand that concept.
Anyway: does anyone have experience with the <$300 LED projectors that they want to share?
I went to Best Buy to actually look at these LED projectors--and unfortunately, they only had one actually connected, it was the $500 one, and no, it was too much work for anyone to pull another one out of a box and plug it in. The only reason to go to a store to buy something like this, instead of doing it online, is to be able to see it in action. But Best Buy in Boise apparently doesn't understand that concept.
Anyway: does anyone have experience with the <$300 LED projectors that they want to share?
Saturday, July 10, 2010
I Have Something Good To Say About Carly Fiorina
I'm pretty sure that this is a battlefield conversion on Fiorina's part, and may not stick, but Senator Boxer has made it very clear where she stands. From the June 29, 2010 San Jose Mercury-News:
Republican Senate Candidate Carly Fiorina said Tuesday that she opposes a ban on assault weapons and supports a U.S. Supreme Court decision this week affirming a Constitutional Right to Bear Arms. In a 45-minute question-and-answer session with reporters here, the former Hewlett-Packard CEO also repeated her backing of Arizona's Controversial Immigration law and said she would support efforts to Repeal the Federal Health Care reform measure.
Friday, July 9, 2010
Manufacturing Lessons
The new design that I am using for square/rectangular tripod leg casters has a number of advantages compared to what I was doing before. Instead of making an adapter to convert from caster to tripod leg out of a single piece of acetal, I now use an aluminum tube and a piece of acetal that I thread for the caster. This has a number of advantages:
1. Much faster manufacture time. The aluminum tube already has a hole in it!
2. If you machine a single piece of acetal, and somewhere along the way, you screw up, you now have an unusable piece of material. I made a mistake yesterday while making a set for a new Losmandy tripod--I drilled the locking screw hole on the wrong side. No problem: I only had to replace the tube part, not the acetal that is drilled and tapped for the casters. And the part that I have to throw away, at least, can be recycled, because it is aluminum.
3. When I start to make the technology switch for the round tripod legs, the same two part strategy means that I can make lots and lots of identical adapters of acetal to fit into one end of round aluminum tubing--while I can machine the other end specific to particular tripod legs. The more you can mass produce at least one part of your product, the cheaper that part gets. I've never seriously considered having these gadgets stamped, cast, or injection molding because you have to have so many of them made at once to be cost effective. But perhaps the threaded acetal adapter--this will be made in sufficient quantity to consider it.
1. Much faster manufacture time. The aluminum tube already has a hole in it!
2. If you machine a single piece of acetal, and somewhere along the way, you screw up, you now have an unusable piece of material. I made a mistake yesterday while making a set for a new Losmandy tripod--I drilled the locking screw hole on the wrong side. No problem: I only had to replace the tube part, not the acetal that is drilled and tapped for the casters. And the part that I have to throw away, at least, can be recycled, because it is aluminum.
3. When I start to make the technology switch for the round tripod legs, the same two part strategy means that I can make lots and lots of identical adapters of acetal to fit into one end of round aluminum tubing--while I can machine the other end specific to particular tripod legs. The more you can mass produce at least one part of your product, the cheaper that part gets. I've never seriously considered having these gadgets stamped, cast, or injection molding because you have to have so many of them made at once to be cost effective. But perhaps the threaded acetal adapter--this will be made in sufficient quantity to consider it.
Thursday, July 8, 2010
Amusing Comment About the Boxer-Fiorina Race in California
As much as I detest Empress Carly, almost anything is a step up from Senator Boxer. An article about how close the race now is (within 3 points) included this entertaining comment:
I want to believe that so badly!This November the American people will bury their collective boot so
deep into Pelosi’s and Reid’s backside they will need the Jaws of
Life to extract it.
Declaration Entertainment
An interesting concept: they get individuals to kick in $9.99 a month to help fund development of movies:
Declaration Entertainment is a grass-roots film-financing movement that turns you, the audience, into Citizen Producers to reclaim American values and put them back on the screen. Declaration Entertainment is dedicated to making the kinds of movies Hollywood used to make - Movies about Freedom and Sacrifice, Hard-Work and Self-Reliance, Faith and Family.An interesting concept. Perhaps I will try and peddle my screenplay to them.
Wednesday, July 7, 2010
Fun With Machining
I spent a bit of time resisting the urge to use inappropriate language while working on a caster set for the Stellarvue Walnut Tripod used on a number of their mounts. I have a customer in Peru who runs a telescope store there, and he has apparently sold quite a number of mounts with this tripod--and wants a rolling solution.
Anyway, after a lot of experimentation, I produced a fascinating and infuriating prototype out of acetal that some lucky customer will get at a bargain price:
I have since come up with something that does the same thing, but that is dramatically simpler to make, and uses mostly off-the-shelf parts:
That piece of wood is a just a chunk of pine that I have planed to the dimensions of the Stellarvue tripod leg, plus or minus a few thousandths of an inch. The hole in the underside is threaded for a 3/8"-16 thumbscrew. It turns out that the tripod leg will be held in just by friction for the vast majority of customers, but a thumbscrew provides a way to secure it. I put the hole in the underside so that any marring that the thumbscrew makes on the leg won't be particularly visible--and using a 3/8" diameter bolt means that the pressure will be applied over a large area, allowing the same force to be applied to be applied at a lower pressure, causing less damage to the tripod leg. Using a thumbscrew also discourages the customer from using a wrench, which would certainly mark the tripod leg.
This is considerably simpler and faster to make than the prototype, and without any temptation to curse! I think it also looks better, and unlike the acetal that I have previously used, any shavings or leftover parts from this are aluminum scrap that can be recycled, to protect Mother Earth, and ScopeRoller's botttom line, which is the more important definition of being Green. There are several new tripods that I now have to support, such as the new Losmandy GM-8 tripod--and this is definitely the direction of the future for ScopeRoller.
Anyway, after a lot of experimentation, I produced a fascinating and infuriating prototype out of acetal that some lucky customer will get at a bargain price:
I have since come up with something that does the same thing, but that is dramatically simpler to make, and uses mostly off-the-shelf parts:
That piece of wood is a just a chunk of pine that I have planed to the dimensions of the Stellarvue tripod leg, plus or minus a few thousandths of an inch. The hole in the underside is threaded for a 3/8"-16 thumbscrew. It turns out that the tripod leg will be held in just by friction for the vast majority of customers, but a thumbscrew provides a way to secure it. I put the hole in the underside so that any marring that the thumbscrew makes on the leg won't be particularly visible--and using a 3/8" diameter bolt means that the pressure will be applied over a large area, allowing the same force to be applied to be applied at a lower pressure, causing less damage to the tripod leg. Using a thumbscrew also discourages the customer from using a wrench, which would certainly mark the tripod leg.
This is considerably simpler and faster to make than the prototype, and without any temptation to curse! I think it also looks better, and unlike the acetal that I have previously used, any shavings or leftover parts from this are aluminum scrap that can be recycled, to protect Mother Earth, and ScopeRoller's botttom line, which is the more important definition of being Green. There are several new tripods that I now have to support, such as the new Losmandy GM-8 tripod--and this is definitely the direction of the future for ScopeRoller.
Bellesiles Again
Disgraced Professor Michael Bellesiles wrote an article for The Chronicle of Higher Education that is everything that the hard left that dominates the profession wants: long on pathos; long on implicit criticism of the United States. But guess what? Bellesiles' credibility has been somewhat tarnished, and a lot of people are looking carefully at his claims--and they are expressing great criticism. Like Dutton Peabody, at Big Journalism:
I don't know for sure that Bellesiles's heart-rending tale is false. There are just lots of little problems that are beginning to show up that don't make sense, unless either Bellesiles was told a pack of lies by "Javier," or Bellesiles decided to improve the story for that highly gullible audience of leftist faculty that dominate the top tier universities in this country.
One of the reasons that a lot of people who commit murder get caught is that they tell others that they did it. It may be expressed as boasting--but considering the consequences, it is more plausible that what drives these admissions is guilt. That's probably why some serial killers who are smart enough to not make mistakes, start to make really obvious ones that get them caught. I sometimes wonder if Bellesiles may be suffering from some similar self-sabotaging motivation: what can I do to destroy myself?
A friend who used to be in the Army is also a mite suspicious about the account of Javier’s service. The Hartford Courant keeps careful track of Connecticut casualties: three Connecticut men died from battle during the autumn semester when Bellesiles was teaching the course: one was a sergeant, which Javier, a recent enlistee, was not; one was a captain, which Javier was even less. The third was not Army, but a Marine, and, like the other two men, died (from an IED, not a sniper round like Javier) in Afghanistan, not Iraq. He did, though, have an infant son back in Connecticut named Javier.Professor Lindgren over at Volokh Conspiracy, whose questions about Bellesiles' research made it acceptable for historians to look at my evidence of Bellesiles' fraud, also points to some problems:
Just for the sake of argument, and positing that “this past semester” is the recently ended spring semester, there has been only one fatality so far this year, reported on April 4th as recently killed. Lance Corporal Tyler Griffin was a Marine, not Army. And killed by an IED, not a shot to the head. And in Afghanistan, not Iraq. Nor was he an immigrant, as Javier is described. (“We discussed [his] reasons for enlisting, which mostly focused on a sense of gratitude to a country that had given their family refuge.”) And there is no sign of a brother in the Courant obituary.
In my review of several sites, but chiefly ICasualties, I find no Connecticut military killed in Iraq in 2009 or 2010 (and only one in 2008, a Marine who died from a non-hostile cause). If one expands the search to all US military deaths in Iraq from all US states and territories from the beginning of the Fall 2009 semester through the end of classes in the May 2010 semester, I could find no deaths from any state that fit Bellesiles’s account (Iraq War, recent Army enlistee, hostile fire from a rifle or similar weapon, lingering death). Nor did my quick review of all US military deaths in Afghanistan (if one changed the theater from Iraq to Afghanistan) during the last two CCSU semesters turn up any likely prospects (though I would need a closer review to be certain).I confess that I am quite mystified. If Bellesiles has "improved" the story to tug the heartstrings, it might explain the discrepancies. But you would think after effectively losing a tenured position for academic fraud--and knowing that a lot of people are going to be checking his subsequent claims because of it--that he would not do anything even slightly questionable.
Thus it appears that Bellesiles’s account is false in at least some trivial respect–probably in the term he taught the course and in the circumstances of “Javier’s” service or death.
Further, without personal knowledge of Army procedures, I found it strange that a critically injured US soldier would not be brought to Germany for treatment over a period of several weeks. Further, while not suspicious in itself, at this stage of the Iraqi War almost all US deaths occur on the same day as the attack or on the following day. Indeed, this detail alone can be used to exclude most deaths in Iraq and Afghanistan in the last year.
If I had to guess, I would suspect that the story Bellesiles told in the Chronicle is mostly true; after all, it would be too easy for the Chronicle or Bellesiles’s department chair to check the facts with “Ernesto” and with Joe, Bellesiles’s teaching assistant. Yet some things reported by Bellesiles in the Chronicle appear to be false: the term he says he taught Military History is inconsistent with CCSU’s website, and the facts of “Javier’s” Army service and death in Iraq do not match any deaths reported by the Department of Defense for soldiers from any US state or territory.
I don't know for sure that Bellesiles's heart-rending tale is false. There are just lots of little problems that are beginning to show up that don't make sense, unless either Bellesiles was told a pack of lies by "Javier," or Bellesiles decided to improve the story for that highly gullible audience of leftist faculty that dominate the top tier universities in this country.
One of the reasons that a lot of people who commit murder get caught is that they tell others that they did it. It may be expressed as boasting--but considering the consequences, it is more plausible that what drives these admissions is guilt. That's probably why some serial killers who are smart enough to not make mistakes, start to make really obvious ones that get them caught. I sometimes wonder if Bellesiles may be suffering from some similar self-sabotaging motivation: what can I do to destroy myself?
Tuesday, July 6, 2010
Sunday, July 4, 2010
Hope You Are Having A Wonderful Fourth of July
I won't be blogging; my daughter, son-in-law, and granddaughter are coming up to watch the fireworks in Horseshoe Bend; we'll be able to see the fireworks from above, again.
Chicago Wants To Tax Handgun Owners
Like $15 per firearm registered, and $100 every three years for a Chicago Firearms Permit. Well, we used to have poll taxes in this country, which you had to pay to vote (and at least partly aimed at the same group that Chicago's law is aimed at: black people). While it took an amendment to the U.S. Constitution to abolish poll taxes as a condition of voting in national elections, in Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections (1966) the U.S. Supreme Court struck down poll taxes in state elections as violating the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment--and uses "fundamental right" to describe the right to vote.
I think there's an argument here that the right to keep and bear arms is even more fundamental than the right to vote. Voting is limited to citizens, while "right of the people" is considerably broader.
I think there's an argument here that the right to keep and bear arms is even more fundamental than the right to vote. Voting is limited to citizens, while "right of the people" is considerably broader.
Saturday, July 3, 2010
Story
As much as I find the notion of high tax rates offensive, there is considerable merit to what Ben Franklin wrote--and note what he has to say here about the advantages of there not being great fortunes in America:
I have blogged in the last couple of days about repulsive examples of what happens where there is too much wealth in a society--the most horrendous behaviors become tolerated.
The almost general mediocrity of fortune that prevails in America, obliging its people to follow some business for subsistence, those vices that arise usually from idleness are in a great measure prevented. Industry and constant employment are great preservatives of the morals and virtue of a nation. Hence bad examples to youth are more rare in America, which must be a comfortable consideration to parents. To this may be truly added, that serious religion, under its various denominations, is not only tolerated but respected and practised. Atheism is unknown there; and infidelity rare and secret; so that persons may live to a great age in that country without having their piety shocked by meeting with either an atheist or an infidel. And the Divine Being seems to have manifested his approbation of the mutual forbearance and kindness with which the different sects treat each other, by the remarkable prosperity with which He has been pleased to favor the whole country.
Updated Dr. Seuss
Although I know that Dr. Seuss was actually a pretty left-wing guy, and would probably love Obama:
I do not like this Uncle Sam,
I do not like his health care scam.
I do not like these dirty crooks,
or how they lie and cook the books.
I do not like when Congress steals,
I do not like their secret deals.
I do not like this speaker, Nan ,
I do not like this 'YES WE CAN.'
I do not like this spending spree,
I'm smart, I know that nothing's free.
I do not like your smug replies,
when I complain about your lies.
I do not like this kind of hope.
I do not like it, nope, nope, nope!
Thursday, July 1, 2010
Never Mill What You Can Buy
The more time I spent trying to mill what I needed (a square hole with a 30 degree angle at the bottom), the more I realized that I needed to find something off the shelf. And sure enough: I found some square and rectangular aluminum tubing the dimensions required for this project. I can plug the bottom of the tubing with a piece of acetal tapped to accept casters, and use machine screws to lock the plug into the tubing.
A few rules for machining stuff:
1. Machine the last .050" inches; use coarser tools to get closer. A chop saw gets you to 1/16" of an inch. I have a planer that lets me get down to .1", easily.
2. Never try to machine something from scratch if there is a part available off the shelf that is close to what you need. The time that you spend trying to machine a block into any shape except a square, rectangle, or a circle, is going to be significant. If you can find that shape off the shelf, whatever you spend on the part will be worth it in time savings and frustration reduction.
3. Always look for a way to machine the part while it is still simple enough to easily clamp to the table (usually because it still has a flat surface). This often means doing something out of the logical sequence.
A few rules for machining stuff:
1. Machine the last .050" inches; use coarser tools to get closer. A chop saw gets you to 1/16" of an inch. I have a planer that lets me get down to .1", easily.
2. Never try to machine something from scratch if there is a part available off the shelf that is close to what you need. The time that you spend trying to machine a block into any shape except a square, rectangle, or a circle, is going to be significant. If you can find that shape off the shelf, whatever you spend on the part will be worth it in time savings and frustration reduction.
3. Always look for a way to machine the part while it is still simple enough to easily clamp to the table (usually because it still has a flat surface). This often means doing something out of the logical sequence.
Want To Be Disturbed?
Professor Kenneth Anderson over at Volokh Conspiracy said something that ten years ago would have been so common sense that no one, except perhaps a devout fundamentalist Muslim, would have disputed it:
A few of the attacks on Professor Anderson's concerns:
Reading comments like the ones in that thread is part of why I am becoming increasingly convinced that homosexuality--at least, open, widely accepted homosexuality--is incompatible with civilization. Progressives are turning into apologists for female genital mutilation because it makes homosexuals feel better about themselves. And Volokh Conspiracy commenters are so thick in lawyers, law professors, and law students (the people that will, as they advance their careers, tell legislators what they are allowed to pass) like these monsters.
Earlier this year, the American Academy of Pediatrics issued perhaps the single most appalling statement of official multiculturalism I have read with regard to the United States in many years. It called for de-criminalizing what might be called a softer, gentler form of clitoral mutilation — allowing for a “ritual nick” of a girl’s clitoris instead. The fundamental argument was that if the US did not relax its criminal laws against “any non-medical procedure performed on the genitals” of a girl, families committed to the practice would take them elsewhere for a much more thorough mutilation.What is disturbing are the comments, many of them from lawyers and law students, essentially arguing that Anderson is being narrow-minded, stuck in traditional Judeo-Christian views, etc. And yet me emphasize: many of those making these arguments are people whose comments I have followed for a long time in other threads, and who have repeatedly made clear their positions. They are progressives, liberals, and homosexuals. Yes: because a cultural practice that is associated with Islam (although not required by it) is under threat, they must defend it--even though it is the worst form of barbarism.
This ritual drawing of a drop of blood from a girl’s clitoris — and that is on the generous assumption that, over a decade or so, that’s all it turns out to be, rather than the stalking horse of the very thing that led to the change in policy — performed in a doctor’s office by, presumably, a pediatrician or nurse following the American Academy of Pediatrics’ advice, would therefore save American girls from a worse mutilation elsewhere. So. The laws of the United States and the norms of American society in a deeply fundamental matter are to be held hostage against the possibility of what might happen to an American girl taken to Somalia or elsewhere. Nowhere in the Academy’s logic did anyone discuss the possibility that relaxing a norm under the threat of its worse violation might count as, well, reward behavior and you’ll get more it. If you give a mouse a cookie, if you give a moose a muffin, and if you give the American Academy of Pediatrics a girl’s clitoris to nick ...
The Academy, under intense pressure from advocates against female genital mutilation, has withdrawn its statement. The advice, of course, is important, because among other things it offers a “best practices” defense against claims of malpractice or abuse or what have you. One of the striking things about the Academy is that it has offered controversial counsel to pediatricians before — such as its advice several years ago about pediatricians interviewing their young female patients alone to solicit the possibility of sexual abuse. Generally its views have trended toward “helping profession” interventions into the family. What therefore makes the Academy’s now-withdrawn view particularly striking is how it essentially opts for “multiculturalism” over conventional feminism. Nor would I assume that this proposal is gone for good. It would be better understood as the Academy and its ideological supporters floating a trial balloon, with an long term advocacy goal of accustoming the public to the idea. Rust never sleeps.
A few of the attacks on Professor Anderson's concerns:
People make this sort of deal all of the time. Parents allow their kids to drink, as long as they do it in their presence. Nevada allows prostitution, as long as the brothels follow certain rules that make the practice more safe. Etc. Etc.And:
Of course, whether this sort of trade off makes sense in this case is a separate question. But the mere fact that the American Academy of Pediatrics is considering it shouldn’t be abhorent to you, unless you always object to this sort of trade off. (Do you?)
Is there any evidence that the ritual “nick” has any negative impacts? Or more negative impacts than, say, ear piercing or tatooing?And:
And this is the one that really gets to the heart of why progressives are defending this:
The right grounds for legalization is that drawing a drop of blood is a reasonable religious accommodation that does not deliver any lasting harm to the children involved. The wrong reason is that we want to make a less-evil but still evil substitute for terrible practices elsewhere.
I’ve read through this whole thread, and I haven’t seen anything to convince me that you can oppose this while supporting ritual (NOT medical, which can be done later in life and with consent) male circumcision on any other ground than “our invisible man in the sky is better than theirs”.Got that? Because male circumcision (which has been demonstrated to have significant health advantages from the standpoint of infections and STD transmission) is part of the Judeo-Christian Western tradition, therefore any practice performed in Muslim countries that can be compared to it by false analogy is therefore okay. And at the core, what drives the progressive and liberal love of not just Islam, but a barbarous practice like female genital mutilation, is fury that Christianity has refused to roll over and play dead on the homosexuality issue.
That said, I think it’s perfectly fine to make a slippery slope argument here– there really is a danger that once you start compromising medical ethics for procedures that are “culturally” supported, you start on a road that ends in a very bad place. But I would argue that’s true of Judeo-Christian male circumcision too– indeed, if that were illegal, we wouldn’t even be arguing as to whether a mild form of female circumcision should be legalized.
Reading comments like the ones in that thread is part of why I am becoming increasingly convinced that homosexuality--at least, open, widely accepted homosexuality--is incompatible with civilization. Progressives are turning into apologists for female genital mutilation because it makes homosexuals feel better about themselves. And Volokh Conspiracy commenters are so thick in lawyers, law professors, and law students (the people that will, as they advance their careers, tell legislators what they are allowed to pass) like these monsters.
Change The Details of This Case...
and ask if this would have received round the clock coverage. Imagine if the three "roommates" were, say, Mormon missionaries, and a gay man had been stabbed to death. Richard Fernandez mentions a case that I had not even heard of:
Like the recently concluded Robert Wone case — in which three gay men were acquitted of the murder of a man in their apartment — the New Black Panther incident pits a politically powerful minority against ordinary victims. The public is asked to understand the situation from the perspective of the underdog. What does it matter if men in New Black Party uniforms paced across a voting precinct? They’re just evening the score. Or so we are told. But in situations where the world’s largest midget fights the world’s smallest giant the “correct narrative” is no longer so obvious; just who is bigger is no longer clear and the system by rights should fall back on the law itself and ask itself “who really violated the law.”Professor Volokh raises a different angle on it--and again, there is so much here that is profoundly disturbing--and yet it is clear that because this gay "triple" (a long-term relationship of three men, at least one of who is into sadomasochism) is at the heart of it--it's getting no coverage. There's a Wikipedia page about it--and the more I read, the more concerned that I am that because of the sexual orientation of the three men who either likely committed the murder, or at least covered up who did it--it is taboo for national news coverage. There's kinky sex, apparently, probably rape, murder, half of Mr. Wone's blood is missing--and suspicious puncture marks, a covered up crime--all the aspects of what would ordinarily be a major news story, just for the prurient aspects alone. But we can't actually look too carefully at this, because it might remind everyone that there are some aspects of some of the gay subcultures that are really, really evil.
But the habits of political correctness are so ingrained that even this logical parachute fails to open. In the Wone case, even when the judge is inclined to find the stories of the three defendants preposterous, the word “guilty” can hardly be pronounced. The Washington Post reports that Judge “Leibovitz said she believed that the three defendants know who killed Wone, but that the prosecution failed to prove that they did. It came down to the reasonable doubt standard, she said.” The Wone case is singular for the questions that were not asked and the media coverage that never materialized.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)