What Qualifies as "Public Indecency" In San Francisco?

What Qualifies as "Public Indecency" In San Francisco?

Americans For Truth About Homosexuality has some unpleasant and definitely not worksafe pictures of what goes on in public streets in San Francisco these days--not just public nudity (which AFTAH has at least blacked out), but what appears to be a very unhygenic sex act taking place that, shall we say, explains the need for a booth visible in another picture offering hepatitis vaccination.

The police were there--they were just told to keep the public nudity and sex acts confined to the public streets that were part of the "Up Your Alley" public festival.

Yeah, yeah, I know, most homosexuals aren't this sick. But when you pass laws saying that there's nothing wrong with homosexuality, you don't get to pick and choose which homosexuals are going to be moving into your town because you told them that it was okay.

So, what still qualifies as public indecency in San Francisco? It certainly doesn't include public nudity. It doesn't include a guy putting his tongue somewhere that the sun doesn't shine. But as I mentioned last year, when a Christian group held a rally in San Francisco, the Board of Supervisors passed a resolution condemning them.

I used to wonder why some Christians insisted that homosexuality, while no worse of a sin than any others, seems to be especially destructive to a society. I don't wonder anymore, when sickness like this is tolerated in public streets--while a Christian rally deserves official condemnation.

UPDATE: Zombietime has a far more detailed collection of pictures--and it was far worse than the examples above. Far worse. You can go for the fuzzed out version, or the fully obscene and gross version when you get there.